The EuroComm Blog 2008

by Yang-May Ooi

Qik.com for live streaming from cell-phones and Seesmic.com for video conversations, will take social media to a whole new level. What are they? How do they work? And will 2008 be the Year of Video Conversations?

Click To Play

This was first posted on my blog ZenGuide.co.uk last week.

If you have difficulty viewing the video on this page, try the following alternative sites:

http://yangmayooi.blip.tv/posts?view=archive&nsfw=dc

http://youtube.com/fusionview

by Hanna Kalla

“Cultures are storehouses of cultural tools to which people have different levels of access and usage. A truly versatile person can make use of tools from quite a variety of storehouses, others would be somewhat more limited.” (Scollon, 1997)

I would like to think that I am a global citizen of the world having spent most of my life hopping across the continents. When I am asked where I am from though, I find it a little difficult. I was born in Finland but left when I was nine. I was brought up in Africa, and then continued my schooling in Switzerland followed by the US. Wanting to see more of the world, I moved to Asia to discover the secrets of tea ceremony. I have now found my way back to Europe and call England home. But where am I from? The short answer is that I am Finnish but not from Finland. My outlook on life is culturally mixed but if you ask my friends and colleagues, they can still see some Finnish cultural traits in me. So, although my cultural heritage does not define me, it is a part of me. Just because many of us work for global businesses, travel extensively, and have access to the same international news sites, does not erase our cultural backgrounds which impact on our behaviour. If we are lucky though, we are better at accessing those cultural storehouses and using the tools we find within them.

Culture can be a really powerful tool that enables you to form connections. And here it is worth clarifying that culture can be based on your nationality, professional identity, organisational values or another common association. Culture goes much beyond the easily observable dress, ethnicity and language to penetrate all the way to our basic assumptions and beliefs. However, cultural differences can also cause obstacles when people hold different expectations of normal behaviour without allowing for alternate styles of communication. Even simple words can have many interpretations based on different cultural contexts. For example, in Europe we use ‘yes’ to mean “I agree”, whereas in Japan it means “I am listening”. You can just imagine the kind of miscommunication that can lead to.

Looking at tools such as Geert Hofstede’s Cultural Dimensions is a great starting point to discovering some of those cultural differences that can be found between different nationalities. I have also carried out research in this field and discovered some very interesting things about micro-cultures and diversity in the workplace. So, is diversity good or bad? That really depends on what you are trying to accomplish… But, I think we can say that despite equalisers such as McDonalds, Starbucks and Nike, culture is still a very important ingredient of today’s global world.

Hanna Kalla (U.K.) is Senior Consultant, Change and Internal Communications at Hill & Knowlton. She joined Hill & Knowlton from Nokia, where she managed internal communications globally for a leading business programme. Prior to that she worked for Nokia Japan where she advised senior managers on intercultural issues affecting multi-site operations. During her time at Nokia, Hanna also studied the strategic role of internal communications in relation to social networks, knowledge sharing, and diversity. Hanna’s background also includes working in account management for Young & Rubicam in New York, and several short projects at the International Labour Organization (ILO) in Geneva.

~~~~~~~~~

Hanna will be speaking at the EuroComm conference with her colleague Sam Berrisford.

Sam Berrisford (U.K.) is Senior Consultant, Change and Internal Communications at Hill & Knowlton. Before joining Hill & Knowlton, he
worked at Royal Mail Group and more recently at the BBC. Here he helped develop and implement a range of strategic, culture change and internal marketing initiatives. As well as the media sector Sam has worked in the logistics, financial services, petrochemical, utility and public sectors. Sam has a background in broadcast journalism. He is a performance coach and creative facilitator and has published articles on many aspects of business and stakeholder communications.

Hanna and Sam will be presenting on:

Differences, Similarities and the Cultural Question

This session explores various issues related to cross-cultural communication and their relevance for both internal and external ommunications. With the help of academic research and case studies, the presenters will discuss the roots of culture and its influence on the way people work together joined by a common purpose, both within and across organisations. They will look
at the process of ‘acculturation’ and examine the willingness to accept change as well as organisational flexibility and adaptability.
Against the background of brand globalisation and the internet, the presenters will examine the influence of culture on mergers and acquisitions. They will also discuss the techniques used by major global corporations that have to manage across diverse geographies.

by Ulrich Gartner

When flipping through a free newspaper on the tube in Stockholm yesterday, my attention got caught by a headline reading ‘Emailing will have disappeared by the end of this year’. Kids nowadays think that emails are just for business, and used by ‘old people’. They, instead, use websites, notice boards, and social platforms to communicate with each other.

I shared the story with some colleagues who have teenage children. We had a lively conversation which, at the end, confirmed that email is practically dead with the younger generation.

I felt this situation provided some deep insight into communications: A newspaper (declared dead a hundred times but still alive and kicking) predicting the irrelevance of what just recently was the latest gadget in communication (I was so proud when I got the email function on my mobile phone last year!). The story was so interesting that it created word-of-mouth (I told it to my colleagues), and subsequently drove some buzz around the office.

I believe this is exactly what communicators today have to deal with. You can’t just keep doing the stuff you’ve known so well for many years; but you can’t exclusively run after the latest trends either. After all, you’ll have to play different tunes to make a sound that people will listen to.

When I went home in the evening, I looked around in the underground and saw a lot of the kids, who supposedly think email is old news, reading– guess what: the good old newspaper. Exciting times for communicators, aren’t they? See you in Barcelona.

Ulrich Gartner (Sweden) is Vice President Communications Europe at AB Electrolux, a global leader in home appliances. Electrolux has worked intensively with social media over the past years. Most recently, Gartner’s in-house PR team has been honoured with an IRPA Golden World Award 2007 for the best e-PR campaign.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Ulrich will be speaking at the EuroComm Conference on:

Engage! Making Social Media an Integrated Part of a PR Campaign

Social media, still, are much too often used as a separate, even slightly disconnected communication channel for very specifi c target audiences. This session will show how they can, instead, become a truly integrated element of broader PR campaigns, delivering on a number of objectives ranging from consumer engagement to media coverage. Two case studies will be presented: Electrolux Design Lab, a global competition for design students, and Electrolux Kitchenstage, the world’s fi rst online reality show
in a kitchen. The session will discuss strategies, techniques used, results delivered, and learnings gained, with special emphasis on how traditional PR techniques and the use of social media were integrated in order to create maximum impact.

by Suzanne Salvo

“There were the huge printing shops with their sub-editors, their typography experts, and their elaborately equipped studios for the faking of photographs” - 1984

Photo manipulation existed long before the age of digital photography, as this famous George Orwell quote written in 1949 implies. Photo technology may have changed since his day, but does that mean the ethics behind photo manipulation has also changed?

When George Orwell wrote those words nearly 60 years ago, news photography was still in its early years. Cameras were still huge and heavy. Photojournalists carried sacks of flashbulbs that had to be painstakingly changed out with each exposure. In the pre-digital world, it took hours in the darkroom to produce a single print.

And it took many more hours to successfully alter an image before Photoshop made it child’s play. With only pre-digital technology, even experts with years of experience had trouble making photo changes that could pass for real. But that didn’t stop them from trying, and succeeding.

What we now call photography was invented around the mid 1800s. For the first 50 years there were hardly any amateurs and only a few “professionals” were willing to operate the giant, finicky, and not very portable machines. At the beginning of the 1900s that changed when George Eastman developed the technology of film to replace the cumbersome photographic plates used up until then. Cameras became smaller, more portable and quicker to use, heralding in the age of photojournalism. For the first time in history on-the-scene, real life visual coverage of events and breaking news was possible, and people just couldn’t get enough of it. High public interest and the subsequent money it spawned created heated competition among photojournalist. That led to some extremely unorthodox photo-reporting techniques.

Test your ethics: what would you do?

Newspaper photographers back in the 20s, 30s and 40s were well known for their exceedingly competitive and questionable ethical practices. There are numerousstories of photojournalists manipulating crime scenes to make more dynamic images. Some were know to carry teddy bears or dolls in their camera bags to use in photos of house fires or train wrecks. By implying a child was involved, the image became emotionally charged and more poignant, which helped sell more papers. There are even ocumented reports of corpses being repositioned to make better photo compositions. Ask yourself: Is it OK for a photographer to change where he/she stands to take a newsphoto if that change provides a more dynamic, interesting view? What if the change of position naturally emphasizes only one aspect of the scene over other important details?

Politicians have long recognized the power of the image for propaganda purposes. Some have tried to literally change history by changing photographs. In one of the better known examples, Stalin had former comrades deemed enemies eradicated from life and either cropped out or “photoshopped” out of existing images. On the other end of the political ethics scale is the photo treatment of former US President Franklin Roosevelt. Very few photos exist showing FDR as disabled. In most cases his image was shot or cropped to show him only from the waist up. As a result a large percentage of the American public was unaware that he was severely crippled. Ask yourself: Is cropping to fit a publication&’s format acceptable? Does cropping constitute unethical manipulation in one or both of the above political scenarios? Does the fact that in the case of FDR it was done “to be nice” change the ethical consideration?

Hard news was not the only thing being manipulated in images in the pre-digital world. The classic depression era photos by Margaret Bourke-White and Lewis Hine are known to have been posed by the photographer in many instances. Ask yourself: Using real people and real settings, the photographer directs a subject to straighten his tie, or asks the subject to look in a certain direction, or removes a distracting piece of trash in the background - is that unethical? Does it make the intended message less true? Knowing the subjects and the situations were real but posed, does it make the image less compelling to you? Does it render the image ethically unusable? Some of these images are credited with helping to rewrite the child labor laws in the USA. When the cause is just, or is “news”, does the amount of photo manipulation allowable change?

The public’s fascination with photography has led to some interesting and sometimes outlandish photo alterations. In 1917 Elsie Wright, 15, borrowed her father’s camera and innocently took pictures of some paper-cutout fairies. She used a simple hat-pin devise to cause the cutouts to fall over during the exposure. On the final print this movement made it look like the fairies were realistically dancing. By a strange twist of fate, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, the creator of Sherlock Holmes, became involved in the fairy story lending it credibility. The photos became internationally well known and for many years were widely believed to be proof of the existence of fairies. In more modern times images of The Loch Ness Monster, now largely held to be fakes, have been used to promote Scottish tourism. Question: Is it ethical to alter an image destined only for marketing or advertising purposes? Or should the same guidelines apply to both news and photo illustrations?

Each of the above photo altering scenarios was accomplished without a pixel in sight, using film, negatives and darkroom echniques. It is now much easier to alter images, making the temptation to do so greater. The question communicators face today is deciding if and how much they should manipulate, not is it possible to manipulate.

Has the ethics behind photo usage changed for corporate communicators? Digital technology didn’t create the ethical dilemma, it only put a big spotlight on it. I’ve asked more questions than I’ve answered in this article. Where ethics are concerned there are seldom clear-cut answers and that is certainly true with photo manipulation ethics.

The subject has sparked a huge debate with widely opposing viewpoints. The topic is so hot, Hollywood has picked up on it in films like Flags of Our Fathers and Spiderman III. As a professional communicator who uses images, you have a stake in the outcome of the debate. Won’t you join the conversation regarding photo ethics? Post your comments here.

And I hope you will join me at the IABC EuroComm. “Seeing is NOT believing.” See you there.

Suzanne Salvo and her husband/partner Chris are co-owners of Salvo Photography, an international award-winning studio with bases in Italy and the U.S. The Salvos has traveled to nearly 60 countries on assignments ranging from ad campaigns, annual reports and editorial. At IABC, Suzanne has served on the 2003-2004 International Executive Board and she is a past president of IABC/ Houston, which named her Volunteer of the Year in 2002. Suzanne writes an informative on-line monthly column, called “Visually Speaking” in IABC’s CW Bulletin, conducts action-packed workshops on photo topics throughout North America and Europe and is a multiple Gold Quill winner. Suzanne is the recipient of the 2007 IABC Chairman’s Award.

~~~~~~~~~~

Suzanne will be speaking at the EuroComm conference on:

Seeing is NOT Believing. Real world Photo Manipulation Ethics

We live in a photoshop world where pyramids can be moved to suit a layout and CEOs enjoy instant weight loss and wrinkle removal - until they get caught. Photos are a great way to bolster your company’s brand and positively affect reputation, right? Right – unless an image has been inappropriately manipulated. The fallout can be costly in terms of company brand and the bottomline. When is it OK legally and/or ethically to manipulate and when is it not? What are the consequences to your company’s reputation?

In this session you will learn:

• How to differentiate between photojournalism and photo illustration
• What the photonews groups advise
• Practical quidelines for when, where and how much manipulation is acceptable
• What companies are doing right now to insure their reputation is protected

by Yang-May Ooi

24 hours after Heath Ledger’s death: how the bloggers have responded; prices for Heath Ledger memoribilia on eBay doubles

Click To Play

This was first posted on my blog ZenGuide.co.uk on 23 Jan 2008.

If you have difficulty viewing the video on this page, try the following alternative sites:

http://yangmayooi.blip.tv/posts?view=archive&nsfw=dc

http://youtube.com/fusionview

Some recent conversations I’ve had with executives and professioals has got me thinking: what’s in a name?

For many companies and businesses who have a natural affinity with innovation and early adaptation of new technology, a business blog is something they have embraced with enthusiasm. They see it as a great way to keep in touch with their clients and customers and to showcase their expertise. However, for other businesses still wondering if communicating online with their stakeholders in this way is something for them, the notion of a blog comes with a bundle of negative pre-conceptions - it’s for teenagers and loud-mouthed mavericks, it’s not a proper platform for serious business communications, it’s about trivial things like what I had for breakfast this morning.

Many busy professionals and senior-level executives have said to me that they don’t have time to read blogs. They aren’t interested in what someone had for breakfast. (What is it about things people have for breakfast that’s become this catch-phrase for blogging?) They’ve got too many emails to get through. What possible business value is there in spending their limited time reading a stranger’s blog?

When working with some clients, I’ve recommended that it may be an idea to re-think this interactive online thing that they are implementing. It’s just a tool that allows you to upload information quickly and easily in reverse date order - you can sort the information into categories and link to other information. What about defining it by what content or information you’re putting on it? If it’s a place where you are offering additional resources to your clients eg you are sharing your expertise for free online; or you are pointing them to other resources they can find on the web; or you are putting up your materials from a conference or workshop - why not refer to it as a Resource Centre? Or what about focusing on the objective of why you want this social media tool - is it to stimulate discussion and engage your stakeholders in conversation? Well, what about calling it a Discussion Space or Conversation Corner?

This simple re-thinking of what the tool is has opened up for my clients a whole range of possibilities which have excited them about the blog platform - a complete transformation from their previous scepticism and uncertainty. For the one setting up a Resource Centre, the creative juices started to flow and they brainstormed a long list of information, resources and articles they could post on their site. For the one creating a Discussion Space, they began to look for contributors to write articles with different views around one theme so that readers might be prompted to add to the discussion via the discussion responses facility (ie comments).

And for those coming to read or participate in such spaces, they are immediately entering an added value space that offers Resources and Discussion, rather than a potentially time-wasting personal diary thing called a blog.

For me, I enjoy reading blogs or discussion spaces or newsletter or whatever you call them, especially blogs by:

• industry experts eg high-profile marketing guru Seth Godin (whose blog is on The Times’ list of top 50 business blogs),

• trend watchers/ news breakers eg TechCrunch and Mashable

• writing and book lovers eg Bibliobibuli

• colleagues eg X-Culture by Silvia Cambie

• friends eg massage therapist Melanie Crowe

• other Asians/ Orientals eg British Born Chinese

I generally steer away from blogs by journalists and reporters like those on the Guardian or the BBC - though I do sometimes find it useful to go to those blogs as well. My reasoning is that I read or hear these paid writers’/ commentators’ views anyway via the news and traditional media channels. The joy of blogs is to hear the voices and encounter the thoughts of those who don’t necessarily already have a grand outlet like the premier news channels for sharing what they have to say. I like the democracy and clamour of the ordinary individual adding to the discussion. I keep them all on my blog aggregator and pick and choose a few to dip into over lunch or when I feel like being stimulated.

Yang-May Ooi (U.K.) is a committee member on the Board of IABC UK with the portfolio for Social Media and is the founder of
ZenGuide, a communications and social media consultancy ( www.zenguide.co.uk). Her writing and cross-cultural blog Fusion View (www.fusionview.co.uk) is read by over 8,000 unique visitors a month and has been featured on the BBC. Yang-May is currently co-authoring a book (with Silvia Cambié of Chanda Communications) on New Trends in International Public Relations, which is due to be published by Kogan Page in 2009.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Yang-May will be chairing a panel discussion on social media at the EuroComm Conference. Details are as follows:

Creating Value through Online Communities

For both internal and external communications, social media tools like blogging, podcasting and forums offer businesses a powerful means of building networks and communities around their products, services and brands. But is it a matter of “Build it and they will come”? Or do you need a more strategic approach? And once your visitors come to your site, how do you engage them and
create value from these interactions?

In this session, you will explore:

• Planning and implementing online communities
• Leadership in community building
• Using live events to create ‘significant moments’
for your community
• Empty chat-rooms, online bores and
psychopaths: how to avoid them
• Creating “sticky” content
• Using video to build audiences
• The intersection of commerce and communities
– can/should you monetise your social media?
• Measuring and evaluating success.

Yang-May will be joined by panelists:

Marc Wright (U.K.) , the former Chairman of the International Visual Communication Association and a member of the board of IABC UK. After selling his agency MCA Live to WPP he launched www.simply-communicate.com – the knowledge site read by 15,000 internal communication professionals each month.

Giles Colborne (U.K.), President of the UK Usability Professionals’ Association from 2003-2007 and is managing director of cxpartners, a company specialising in designing user interfaces (www.cxpartners.co.uk ). A frequent guest speaker at conferences around the world, Giles writes on usability for Revolution magazine. Giles was also an editorial board member for
PAS78, the British Standards Institute’s guidance on making websites accessible for people with disabilities.

Photo: thanks to raisinsawdust on flickr.com

by Nada Serajnik

Do you remember the introduction of the euro in your country? In the last six years, fifteen European countries have introduced the euro as the common currency. And there are more countries preparing to enter European Monetary Union.

Changing currency affects many aspect of our life. Communication is thus an essential part of countries’ preparation for the introduction. One task, many approaches! Experience shows many similarities and but also differences. What do you remember from your national campaign?

We encounter public communication campaigns every day, almost everywhere we look. Most people remember election campaigns and promotional campaigns for products or services. Anyone can name at least few campaigns aimed at improving health, traffic safety, respect for human rights or protection of the environment. Not only national, but also international ones.
There are many different kinds of campaigns – memorable ones, be it for their message or creativity, those which draw criticism or annoy people, and those which pass (almost) unnoticed.

The term ‘public communication campaign’ entails “everything connected with informing, educating, raising awareness or engaging the public on a public issue or matter in the public interest”. Can public issues win their share of public attention in the increasingly saturated sphere of communications?
Actually, the number of campaigns is growing, but all too frequently clients and providers fail to ask if they all are necessary and meet the requirements to make them successful.
The following points come to mind:
• Before we decide to launch a campaign, we must know if we really need it. Will the campaign help the issue?
• Managing campaigns is not simple. They have to be planned and run strategically. Case studies show that providers omit many steps from strategic planning or give them insufficient attention. How can we succeed if we do not know how to define our purpose and goals well?
• Many campaigns focus only on the media and advertising. However, we must listen to the people, and give them a chance to contribute to the campaign, and, most importantly, show them what they have to do. How?
• Assessing and demonstrating effectiveness and efficiency during and after a project is also required for communication campaigns. How else can we confirm that we have met the goals we set or justify the use of public funds?

Every campaign is unique; it is governed by its own rules and particular features. Still, we can learn a lot from other examples, particularly good practices. Let it be Slovenian!

In Slovenia, the introduction of the euro was carried out smoothly, quickly and without major difficulties, which can also be attributed to a good national communication campaign. The campaign was also an excellent learning experience, not just for us in public sector. You will find out more about the particulars at the conference…

But Slovenia is now facing another great project – Presidency of the Council of the European Union.…

Photo: thanks to donaldtownsend from flickr.com (CCL)

Nada Serajnik Sraka (Slovenia) is a senior communication advisor at the Government Communication Office. Her professional expertise is in PR and communications working in business and the public sector. She is the founding member of Public Relations Society of Slovenia (PRSS) and IABC Slovenia and has served as President to both associations. Nada is an Accredited Business Communicator (ABC) and has a master in communication (MA).

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Nada will be speaking at the EuroComm Conference on:

Communication Lessons for the Public Sector: the Introduction of the Euro in Slovenia

The introduction of a new currency, the Euro, was a major communication challenge for twelve European countries in 2002. Introducing a new currency is a large and complex logistical project, involving the cooperation of several decisionmaking bodies. Besides technical preparations for the changeover, providing information to the public should be one of the priority tasks of the
authorities and all those involved. On 1 January 2007, Slovenia was the first new member state to introduce the Euro. According
to the report of the European Commission, Slovenia’s Euro adoption was swift and smooth. In informing the public, Slovenians took into account the experiences of the countries that had successfully introduced the Euro in 2002 as well as other factors specific to their social environment. A two year national communication campaign paved the way for the successful changeover process.

This presentation highlights the main features of the Slovenian communication campaign and shows the similarities and ifferences between the campaigns of other European countries in adopting the Euro. This session will be of interest to those involved in public communication campaigns of a large scale and similar complexity.

by Gina McAdam

If you’re searching for the secret behind good communications, you could do worse than to adopt Lord Beaverbrook’s advice to his talented but dissolute granddaughter, Lady Jeanne Campbell. In the 1950’s, young, alone and pre-Norman Mailer (she was his third), Jeanne was writing for Beaverbrook’s Evening Standard from New York when he told her:

‘Emphasise human interest. Put the strawberry on top of the basket. Write short sentences. Cut, cut, cut. Always interview people face to face. Never rewrite from another newspaper. Keep widening your circle of acquaintances – even if it means accepting the invitation of bores. Use your feet.’

Now I’m sure I wouldn’t be the first person to regard this particular whiplash approach as the template for good journalism. But I would go one step further to say that regardless of the whom, what and why – and be it B2B or B2C communications – it’s all about how you can:

- make people care about your message
- lead with the most interesting proposition
- keep it simple and concise
- stay fresh
- stay networked, and
- maintain boundless energy

My presentation at Eurocomm 2008 is called ‘Trading Places: Using Communications to engage the Private Sector in Public Agendas’. I’ll be drawing from my consultancy experience of pulling together, through communications, some truly disparate groups. Of negotiating a minefield of incongruent attitudes and dissonant voices, and harnessing them towards a common goal. One laid out by government, no less.

I think it’s fair to say that in general people who work in the public sector, at least in the UK, are somewhat ambivalent about their counterparts (if you can call them that) in private enterprise. Perhaps it’s inverted snobbery – civil servants, educationists, social workers are worthy; the rest are all free-market capitalists. Corporates and private businesses, on the other hand, can have a negative knee-jerk reaction to anything emanating from government, and see public officials as maybe just a little bit out of synch with the real world.

Perhaps the greatest challenge was getting executives to show up to meetings at all! But they did.

Keeping my interpretation of Beaverbrook’s advice close to my chest, we thought of ways to entice businesses into a programme demanding precious time without the promise of profile or riches. In the end, it was all about engaging them in own their terms, in ways that interested them as business people: speaking their language (and not in arch sound-bites), meeting them on their own turf (the empty boardroom, the Adam Street Club), using media and technology that made sense and cost less time (short emails, shorter texts), amongst others. And never, ever, using words like ‘incongruent’, ‘dissonant’ or ‘harness.’

The other side of the coin of course was getting the public sector representatives to accept these terms too. But I won’t go deeper than this here. I hope to see a few people at my seminar in Barcelona.

Being a La Sallite (or La Sallian) myself, I’m overjoyed that Eurocomm 2008 is being held where it is in Barcelona. In Manila where I’m from, De La Salle is known for generating graduates who go into the world to become straight talking, no nonsense, risk-taking leaders and entrepreneurs. In other words, the ideal communicators.

Gina McAdam (U.K.) is Director of Stratemarco Limited. She was born in the Philippines and has a B.A. in Literature from De La Salle University. Gina began her career as an account executive for Saatchi & Saatchi-Ace Compton and JWT in Manila. She has worked in teaching and publishing in Madrid and New York and used to be Head of Marketing and Head of Policy and Public Affairs for a national training organisation in the UK. Gina is Immediate Past Vice President of City Women’s Network (UK), a member of the Institute of Directors and a Changemaker for the UK charity Working Families. She is also a Director of the Café Spice Namaste Group in London. Gina holds an MA from the University of Newcastle upon Tyne and attended Henley Management College.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Gina will be speaking at the EuroComm Conference on the following:

Trading Places: Using Communications to engage the Private Sector in Public Agendas

This session will explore the work done to engage the private sector in major public sector programmes carried out on behalf of or involving key agencies in the United Kingdom, including the Learning & Skills Council (LSC), London Development Agency, Small Business Service and JobCentre Plus. Gina will describe the communication strategies she used to involve initially resistant businesses in a scheme funded by the then Department for Education and Skills with the aim of raising skill levels in the £94 billion UK hospitality and tourism industry. The outcomes prove that communication is instrumental in encouraging cooperation between public and private sector stakeholders and in helping them to ‘trade places’ and to better understand each other’s views.

by Andrew Riley

The IABC’s seventh EuroComm conference in Barcelona 4-5th February looks a right cracker. As the Chair of the sixth EuroComm in Dublin I was so pleased to meet at EuroComm nearly a hundred senior communicators from approximately 20 countries. Ramon Olle, then CEO and chairman of the board at EPSON Europe was our first plenary speaker in Dublin giving us his CEO insight into what is leadership in a diverse corporate world and how can it be communicated. He not only ended up staying to listen to the other speakers remaining for the entire two days in Dublin, but he also has been instrumental in setting up the ties with La Salle university in Barcelona to host EuroComm 2008!

What stands out for me is that EuroComm is a conference put together by IABC European professional communicators for themselves and their peers. Those helping out at IABC do it for free - because we are confident and committed to our work and because we want to make the conference registration fee accessible to people at all levels.

What I took away from Dublin EuroComm was an immense wealth of IABC friendships and knowledge of the art and craft of professional communication - such as John Simmons of The Writer sublime explanation of his use of storytelling to define the Guinness brand essence to the Guinness board and marketing team. I have never before heard a conference hushed to such silence as when John narrated an imaginary story of travelling around Africa to find the Guinness essence and ended it by the cat Pangar Ban in library of Trinity College Dublin next to the Book of Kells. In contrast to this communication approach we were sharply brought down to earth by the strategies and practicalities of combining people and technology in communication by John Leggate CBE, Chief Information Officer for BP and winner of 2007 European Excel Award, and by Paul Mylrea, director of media relations for Transport for London who led the response to last July’s bomb attacks. (Some of the presentations at Dublin are available for download at http://europe.iabc.com/eurocomm/presentations.php )

One of the take aways from Dublin was the great interest in learning about corporate communication and social media, the break-out session of Marc Wright of Simply Communicate became standing room only and so it is by popular demand that Barcelona features an afternoon panel discussing “Creating Value through Online Communities” with Yang-May Ooi, Marc Wright and Giles Colborne. Other comments we have taken on board in putting the IABC 2008 EuroComm conference together is to maintain our commitment to showcase communication excellence throughout Europe and to have more break-out sessions to cover a broad range of issues.

Now it’s time for you to take action and take a good long read through the 2008 EuroComm programme - it’s a delicious as a Dublin beer and a Catalan coffee.

Andrew Riley is an assurance reporting and communications specialist at Harrison Riley and President, IABC UK (UK)